How we got it
Where your range comes from
You get a range, not a number. Nobody can work out your exact adult height. Here is each range, and the working behind it.
Your range
Free uses the Tanner method, a proven height formula. It needs three things: your mum’s height, your dad’s height, and whether you’re a boy or a girl.
It doesn’t use your age, your height today or your weight.
Show the working
Add your mum’s height and your dad’s height and halve it. Boys usually end up about 6.5 cm taller than that, girls about 6.5 cm shorter. That’s because boys and girls grow differently.
Most people finish within 8.5 cm of their middle. So your range is that middle ±8.5 cm. This is the Tanner method, from 1970. It uses only your parents’ heights, so it’s wide.
middle = (mum + dad ± 13 cm) ÷ 2
(+13 for the boys’ chart, −13 for the girls’ chart)
range = middle − 8.5 cm to middle + 8.5 cm
Adding 13 cm before halving is the same as adding 6.5 cm after. It’s written this way because that’s how the app does it. Heights outside 100 cm to 230 cm are refused, not guessed.
The ±8.5 cm width covers roughly the 3rd to the 97th centile. That’s about 95 people in 100. Tanner later widened it to about ±9 cm for girls and ±10 cm for boys. Centile keeps the original width, so the true range may be wider.
Your Plus range
For a narrower range, Plus uses the Khamis–Roche method. It takes what you’ve already given and adds your age, your height today and your weight today.
Centile Plus, ages 13 to 17½.
Show the working
Plus uses four things: your age, your height now, your weight and your parents’ middle. Each one is multiplied by a number. That number fits your age and the chart you picked. Added together, they give your number.
Nine in ten boys finish within 5.3 cm of their number. For girls it’s 4.3 cm. That distance either side is your Plus range. This is the Khamis–Roche method, from 1994.
This is the regression, which works in inches and pounds:
predicted adult height (inches)
= intercept
+ (height coefficient × current height in inches)
+ (weight coefficient × current weight in pounds)
+ (parent coefficient × mean parent height in inches)
The four numbers change with age and with the chart. We use the last half-year age band you have fully reached. We don’t round up. We convert to inches and pounds, work it out at full precision, then convert back. We use the corrected 1995 tables.
How you compare with people your age
This is a different thing. It puts your height checks next to other people your age. It’s part of Plus, because it needs your age and your height.
It describes you today. It is not your range and it is not a diagnosis. Centile uses the CDC 2000 US growth reference. Source: CDC. CDC does not endorse Centile. The source data are available free from CDC. We ask for birth month and year, so each age is approximate.
What Centile doesn’t know
Neither range knows about puberty, illness, medicine, food or a mistake in a parent’s height.
Neither can spot a growth problem. If you’re worried about your growth, talk to a doctor.
The evidence behind those limits
Early and late developers. A 2026 study compared Khamis–Roche with bone-age predictions in Portuguese adolescents. The results differed by maturity group. For early-maturing boys, Khamis–Roche ran about 3.8 cm higher. For late-maturing boys it ran about 3.0 cm lower. This compared two predictions, not real adult heights. So the size of the gap is uncertain.
Unusually tall or short parents. The formula may be less accurate when both parents are far from average height. In the same study it ran high for boys with very tall parents. It ran low for boys with very short parents.
Age. Centile asks for birth month and year, not an exact date. This collects less about you, but makes your age slightly less precise.
Sources
- Khamis HJ, Roche AF. Predicting Adult Stature Without Using Skeletal Age: The Khamis-Roche Method. Pediatrics. 1994;94(4):504–507. doi:10.1542/peds.94.4.504
- Khamis HJ, Roche AF. Erratum: corrected Tables 1 and 2. Pediatrics. 1995;95(3):457. doi:10.1542/peds.95.3.457 — these are the tables we use.
- Tanner JM, Goldstein H, Whitehouse RH. Standards for children's height at ages 2–9 years allowing for height of parents. Arch Dis Child. 1970;45(244):755–762. doi:10.1136/adc.45.244.755 — the origin of the parent-adjusted approach behind your range.
- For the 6.5 cm shift, for the ±8.5 cm width as the 3rd-to-97th-centile band Tanner set, and for the report that the band was later widened: Accurate prediction of children's target height from their mid-parental height.
- Fragoso I, et al. Validity of the Khamis-Roche method, relative to bone age, in Portuguese children and adolescents from 11 to 15 years. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2026;102(5):101578. PMCID: PMC13355637
- American Academy of Pediatrics. Predicting a Child's Adult Height